(no subject)
Aug. 7th, 2006 10:20 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My new article "Buffy the Vampire Slayer": Future Is Now". for AccociatedContent collects my thoughts on Whedonverse, modern entertainment and interaction between professional and amateur art. Curiously, the impetus for this article was a Spuffy-bashing paper written by another fan.
I love fics by Ducks aka
theantijoss. I respect her work and consider her one of the best BtVS\AtS ficwriters. But recently her dislike of Spuffy turned her into professional Spuffy-hater and now she confesses that she earns money by blaming Buffy and Spike on damaging of "the show's meta-narrative of female empowerment" as well as negative influence on young viewers.
Recently she published on AssociatedContent a very agressive and harsh paper "Messages About Sex and Violence in the Buffy/Spike Relationship on Buffy the Vampire Slayer A Fine Line Between Love and Hate" - an extremely biaised, slanted and one-sided view on the Spuffy relationship. Before you click on the link to her paper, be warned that she gets more money with every click. (reference link)
I don't know if her anti-Spuffy manifesto is a an attempt to start a quest against Buffy and Spike in official media or she decided to write about the most popular BtVS couple because Spuffy invariably attracts interest. Anyway, I found it unfair that Spuffy is mispresented by only one, extremely prejudiced opinion on AccociatedContent so I wrote a response. Actually I should be grateful to Ducks because her article urged me to collect my scattered thoughts on professional and amateur art, on writer's responsibility and BtVS phenomenon. Unlike her, I won't get a dime for my article because AssociatedContent managers can only pay to legal residents of the United States. But I didn't write it for money. I wrote it because I love Buffy and Spike. So - read, recommend, comment, agree, disagree; I'm open to debates.
I love fics by Ducks aka
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Recently she published on AssociatedContent a very agressive and harsh paper "Messages About Sex and Violence in the Buffy/Spike Relationship on Buffy the Vampire Slayer A Fine Line Between Love and Hate" - an extremely biaised, slanted and one-sided view on the Spuffy relationship. Before you click on the link to her paper, be warned that she gets more money with every click. (reference link)
I don't know if her anti-Spuffy manifesto is a an attempt to start a quest against Buffy and Spike in official media or she decided to write about the most popular BtVS couple because Spuffy invariably attracts interest. Anyway, I found it unfair that Spuffy is mispresented by only one, extremely prejudiced opinion on AccociatedContent so I wrote a response. Actually I should be grateful to Ducks because her article urged me to collect my scattered thoughts on professional and amateur art, on writer's responsibility and BtVS phenomenon. Unlike her, I won't get a dime for my article because AssociatedContent managers can only pay to legal residents of the United States. But I didn't write it for money. I wrote it because I love Buffy and Spike. So - read, recommend, comment, agree, disagree; I'm open to debates.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 09:58 am (UTC)For some reason my computer won't let me copy and paste parts of your article (?) but I think Joss clearly states his position about writing for television and writing a show which isn't designed for children and was never meant for children. These are adult themes and they are universal themes and merely to say he's irresponsible because your ship of choice didn't end up being the most popular one on the show is absurd.
No fan on this show got a happy ending and as you point out, that's what drives the fan fiction market. It's been 3 years since the show went off the air and people are still debating the events on screen. Surely that's the mark of quality writing.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 03:45 pm (UTC)Funnily, *my* computer also doesn't let me copy parts of AssociatedContent texts. The only way is to ctrl+a, ctrl+с, then paste the whole page in your notepad from which you can copy and paste the parts you need.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 01:08 pm (UTC)Happy endings are just that - endings. Without being given them it left the door open for continued interpretation and innovation in fanfiction to continue and build on the characters that Joss gave us. And I'm off now before I start to waffle!
Thanks ever so.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 03:56 pm (UTC)I think that Fowler is talented fanfiction writer, but I can't agree with her views on BtVS and Spuffy. Where she sees a dangerous message harmful for young viewer's morality, I see a brilliant story of love that triggers countless fanfiction stories.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 01:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 03:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 04:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 04:33 pm (UTC)As a non-shipper who enjoys reading a variety of 'ships in the Buffyverse, I appreciate your response.
I read Ms. Fowler's earlier essay - and thought it well-done, but somewhat one-sided.
Now that I know that she is benefitting from the article, as well as writing under the psuedonym, "Ducks", I find it interesting that she appears to have one set of ethics for the essay, and another for the fanfiction she writes.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 08:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 05:16 pm (UTC)Well done!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-07 09:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-10 02:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-10 07:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-12 10:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-13 09:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 09:19 pm (UTC)никогда не любила ложных скромников и псевдо-правдо-искателей, а девушка дакс в этом явно преуспевает. я рада, что ты нашла время и силы дать ей достойный отпор.
п.с. *недоумевая* я почему-то не вижу твоих записей в своем избранном, хотя точно помню, что тебя туда вносила. странно...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 10:21 am (UTC)Спасибо за отзыв!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 11:17 am (UTC)ну, ладно, разберемся))