moscow_watcher (
moscow_watcher) wrote2009-02-08 01:35 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Buffy #22 review and spoilery specs
Plot: Kennedy is sent to Japan to evaluate Satsu's leadership. Together they catch a monster, who tried to abduct a fluffy vampire!kitten toy. Without second thoughts slayers take their trophy into their bedroom. At night the
Steven DeKnight, what happened to you? You used to write the most brilliant ("Dead Things", "Seeing Red") and creepy ("Hellbound") episodes on BtVS and AtS. How come that you wrote a story with with "mwahaha, I'm evil!" villains, dubious metaphors, characters irrational behavior and enormous amount of squick?
No, I'm serious. Here's examples of dialogs:
"Mmm babies! We should make some like normal girls instead of running around hitting people!"
***
"We're nothing but a bunch of self-righteous little ovaries! "
***
"Get in her mouth, get in her --!"
***
"Eat their ****ing ovaries!"
Apparently it's supposed to sound funny. I read a suggestion that ludicrous dialogues are parodying anime subtitles. Maybe. Maybe not.
There is a great post by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Back to #22: the majority of reviewers saw vampy kittens as a reference to popular Japanese toys and The Swell as a homage to manga monsters. My first impression was that it's a parody/retelling/rip-off of Alien movies (Joss wrote a script to one of them 12 years ago). But the funniest interpretation I know goes back to "Kittens jihad" - shipper wars back in 2002, when Willow/Tara shippers, known as Kittens, unleashed a war against ME writers for killing off Tara and proclaimed that her death caused a great damage to gay and lesbian community. So, the issue about two lesbians overcoming a bunch of evil Kittens could also be a wink to the fandom by DeKnight who wrote the episode that featured Tara's death.
I don't want to recycle other reviewers' complaints about Buffy's unexplainable stupidity, although her decision to keep the submarine surpasses even her bank-robbing activities. I'm not sure I understand correctly DeKnight's metaphors and references. For example, I find dubious the idea of demonic possession manifested in the desire to wear national clothes and have children. But I can't understand if it's a clumsy plot device to signal us that something in wrong with Satsu, or a reference to some mangas, or an insight into Japanese culture I don't get.
I have to confess that after reading that issue I wanted to go and have a shower. It squicked me. The scene where vampy kittens break out of human bodies was particularly squicky. The plot about vampy kittens vaguely resemble Lynch's Shadow Puppets, but in Lynch' story little monsters are stuffed and they don't get into human bodies. They're reasonably creepy - evil but not repugnant. In The Swell we see a legion of vampy kittens who penetrate human bodies through mouths, suck them dry and then burst out ot cavity chests. I mean - how disturbing it is?
But I read other fans' responses and nobody seems disgusted. Maybe I'm just unaccustomed to to mangas? Does it often happens in mangas?
In any case, this is an issue I want to forget ASAP.
In other news, during recent Q&As Scott Allie admitted that "what's important for Season Eight is understanding how corruption/compromise has affected Buffy" so now we know for sure that bank-robbing and submarine-stealing was intended to spell: B-u-f-f-y I-s W-r-o-n-g.
I wonder how Joss plans to resolve the situation. To make a spell that takes away all slayer power? To banish slayers from Earth dimension? To put them under government control? Or maybe Joss wants to end the season with Buffy and Scoobies arrested, while the world is succumbing to vampire rule? If vampires become a metaphor for media, this is pretty topical. :)
I'd love to finish my ramblings ans specs with a sentence without a question mark, but I'm afraid I don't have coherent conclusion. So, the last question: could anybody identify the green monster on Kennedy's t-shirt?
no subject
no subject
no subject
Maybe this story is his way of saying sorry?
I find dubious the idea of demonic possession manifested in the desire to wear national clothes and have children
Yes, that's very odd.
Also, like you, I'm glad Allie's clarified that we are in fact supposed to find Buffy's behaviour 'off' and worrying. It doesn't say much for my trust in Joss etc, that I ever wondered if we were in fact supposed to think her perfectly justified in everything she did, but I did.
no subject
no subject
It’s kind of ironic the way so many of the complaints of heavy handedness in DeKnight’s depiction of misogynist homophobic monsters come from the same fandom that has been pitying the poor Slayers for having no men in their lives, castigating Buffy for being more focused on saving the world than going back home to attend to her baby sister and are adamant that misogyny is no part of Twilight’s agenda despite his explicitly gendered belittling of Buffy (just like a girl) and his acolytes’ constant reference to Slayers as if they were some kind of animal. They spawn (Voll), they’re ‘fillies’ (Roden) Buffy’s that bitch (the army woman) and that’s without even mentioning Warren’s opinions on the matter.
no subject
Thank you! Sometimes my cluelessness in regard of popular culture is embarassing! :)
As to the rest of your comment, no, I don't find it ironic and I don't think that DeKnight was referencing fandom's attitude by The Swell's misogyny - if that's what you imply. AFAIK, DeKnight didn't inderact with fans after the Kittens fiasco - and rightly so.
no subject
no subject
Gotta say I haven't seen many fans shouting "I'll eat ya ovaries" at each other though. Well so far at least. *g*
no subject
no subject
I read a suggestion that ludicrous dialogues are parodying anime subtitles. Maybe. Maybe not.
Have you seen the Dark Horse webcomic that accompanies this issue, also written by DeKnight?
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewProfile&friendID=218201811
"You are giantly rotund!" "And ill-smelling!" "Please remove your offensive presence!"
I don't know how obvous it would be to someone who doesn't have English as their first language but trust me: the dialogue is definitely a parody of badly-subtitled anime. The excessive violence, giant monsters, etc are also stereotypical.
The whole issue, to me, is similar; it's gloriously over-the-top, cartoony parody. I think it's quite deliberate. The current arc of the comic is five independent stories by five different writers, and I think they're using the opportunity to play around with different styles that might not fit into the more serious arc episodes.
I can't understand if it's a clumsy plot device to signal us that something in wrong with Satsu, or a reference to some mangas, or an insight into Japanese culture
Well, traditional Japanese culture is even stronger on the need for women to stay home, look decorative and have babies than American culture. Dressing Satsu up in an old-fashioned kimono is another signal that whoever was responsible for the Swell wants to turn back the clock. (That wasn't just 'national clothes', it was 'clothes people wore two centuries ago'. It's like the dress Buffy wore in 'Halloween', and had similar implications.)
To make a spell that takes away all slayer power? To banish slayers from Earth dimension?
I hope not. If the theme of the season is "Empowering these women has led to some of them using their power unwisely" I don't think offering the solution "And therefore it was a mistake to empower these women, and we should make them helpless again" would send a good message...
no subject
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewProfile&friendID=218201811
Yes, I saw it but shrugged it off as a joke.
I don't know how obvous it would be to someone who doesn't have English as their first language but trust me: the dialogue is definitely a parody of badly-subtitled anime.
The dialogue sounded very weird to my foreign ears (or, rather, eyes) but, to me, the whole story was extremely baffling.
The whole issue, to me, is similar; it's gloriously over-the-top, cartoony parody.
Maybe fans who have some manga experience enjoy the parody on its stereotypes. I get that manga and anime are very popular today - some of my friends, former BtVS fans, switched to anime and mangas. But I couldn't get into it.
The excessive violence, giant monsters, etc are also stereotypical.
Obviously I read the cultural references wrong and the similarities to Alien movies weren't intended.
If the theme of the season is "Empowering these women has led to some of them using their power unwisely" I don't think offering the solution "And therefore it was a mistake to empower these women, and we should make them helpless again" would send a good message...
But Joss could steer around this message by showing that de-empowering *all* slayers is equally wrong and clueless humanity succumb to Twilight's evil PR tricks. It could be a great set-up for season 9: Buffy-the-outcast-ex-slayer trying to fight vamps without her slayer power.
no subject
no subject
*Chokes with laugh*
I think it's just a dirty joke perpetrated on the Salchio Corporation, the Slayers, and Larry King Alive by Kumiko Ishiara with the help of Saga Vasuki *smirk*.
Yay Kumiko! *starts dreaming about Harmony/Kumiko/Saga Vasuki threesome pr0n*
no subject
no subject
no subject
Dawn herself, as Buffy surrogate sister/daughter, foreshadowed the Potentials with whom Buffy shared her powers eventually. With Faith she refused to share anything, with Dawn she felt she had to...with the Potentials it was her choice completely.
If we put aside the pussy joke, I think that the kittens have always been connected to the slayerhood, in one way or another, whether it was about Buffy herself (the big kitten she followed in the desert) about Dawn who was part of Buffy, or about the Potentials who were Buffy's babies.
The fact the kittens have turned evil might mean that Buffy is losing something now.
no subject
no subject
That just makes the fact that Spike gambled with them and occasionally ate them (potentially anyway--no pun intended) quite funny.
no subject
Oh, God. That an idea. Now I'll never be able to watch the kitten pocker scenes with the same attitude! :))))
no subject
Still makes me giggle though :P
no subject
no subject
I have no idea if it had anything to do with manga, but frankly, I thought it was too silly to squick me. Like you, it mainly made me think of the Alien series, and while that's a pretty creepy concept, it's also become a little too commonplace to be creepy in and of itself.
now we know for sure that bank-robbing and submarine-stealing was intended to spell: B-u-f-f-y I-s W-r-o-n-g.
I never understood the people who were (and in some cases still are) arguing that Buffy's doing everything right; as far as I can tell, it's been pretty obvious since #8 at least that she's doing a bunch of things that always equal raising the Big Red Flag of Wrong in the Jossverse. I don't think it's supposed to be as simple as her simply being "wrong", though; it's supposed to look like a difficult situation where none of the alternatives really is 100% completely simple and good - which makes it all the more unfortunate that they've apparently decided not to show us any of the decisions that led her to this point, or exactly what the current situation is with "everyone" hating the Slayers, etc. Show us why Buffy does what she does as opposed to doing something else, and she might look more justified.
I wonder how Joss plans to resolve the situation.
I'm still pretty convinced there's some sort of epiphany coming. And I'm still pretty convinced that the longer we have to wait and the more they screw up in the meantime, the more eye-rolling it will cause. But we'll see.
no subject
Apparently, Joss thinks he already did it. Buffy robbed the bank to buy a radar. Which didn't prevent the destruction of the castle several issues later.
I'm still pretty convinced there's some sort of epiphany coming. And I'm still pretty convinced that the longer we have to wait and the more they screw up in the meantime, the more eye-rolling it will cause. But we'll see.
If the seasonal arc will end with Buffy's realisation that it's wrong to rob banks, that will be a bit disappointing, to put it mildly. :)
I'm trying to fugure out what kind of consequences Joss could prepare for Buffy. Taking away her slayer powers for a while could be an interesting option. Especially in a world ruled by vampires.
no subject
no subject
Willow: Not killing humans is what separates us from the bad guys.
Buffy: No, not being bad is what separates us from the bad guys.
It's unclear how we should react on Buffy's words. After all, she *did* kill humans - the knights of Byzantium were human, Spike's chip worked on them. But, ultimately, Buffy was right to kill them, because it was self-defence.
no subject
But what I was referring to specifically was the amount of fans who seem(ed) to not notice that he's had Buffy checking every box on the Whedonverse Darkness Arc checklist. A story about power corrupting only works if the readers can see that the character with power is being corrupted; otherwise, it's all rather pointless. Whether that's the reader's fault or Whedon's, I leave up to... well, me. ;-)
*isn't sure if that made any sense, but it's late*
no subject
I'm a tried and true fan of Deadwood and its 'one-f-word-per-minute' creative swearing, but seeing all these villains and Slayers cursing to beat the band is a little jarring.
no subject
I wonder if I understood correctly and "ovaries" are euphemism for c-word?
no subject
Isn't that what happened in the first three episodes of Angel? However, references to manga when everyone does not read it does not make for fun references, I'm sure. Then again, it worked on South Park...maybe it just doesn't translate well (the reference I mean) in comic books?
no subject
I don't remember any episode where "posession" took such gross forms. Of course, it's easier to draw a panel than to shoot an "Alien" sequence...
maybe it just doesn't translate well (the reference I mean) in comic books?
Maybe they should have invited a guest artist who knows to draw mangas to work on this issue.
no subject
I didn't actually see this comic (and I more than likely never will), but what I meant is that the joke itself, and not the drawings (the funny speech patterns and stuff), just don't work well in a comic. In South Park, there was music in the anime fashion, and the gratuitous violence of the ep fit within the context of the story. It worked on every level for me, and I don't even watch anime or read mangas or whatever.
no subject
In South Park, there was music in the anime fashion, and the gratuitous violence of the ep fit within the context of the story. It worked on every level for me, and I don't even watch anime or read mangas or whatever.
Maybe BtVS doesn't work the way South Park works because, unlike South Park, BtVS was supposed to be about Serious Things? Then again, maybe this issue was intended as a big joke. :)
Buffy review
(Anonymous) 2009-02-08 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)I have only a few things to add:
http://tyroshutterbug.wordpress.com
Re: Buffy review
no subject
The plot about vampy kittens vaguely resemble Lynch's Shadow Puppets, but in Lynch' story little monsters are stuffed and they don't get into human bodies. They're reasonably creepy - evil but not repugnant.
I found the whole kitty thing ridiculous - not the vampy kitten idea, which could be neat, except it just went completely haywire. 'Repugnant' is a good word. (Whereas Lynch's ninja puppets were just adorable and deadly. *pets them*)
Well, I guess we'll see if my masochistic curiosity gets the better of me when the next issue comes out. For now I'm very busy finishing the next chapter of my WIP...
no subject
Heh. After the fall of communism in Russia practically all creative people went through collective artistic crisis. The majority of them never recovered. :(
I found the whole kitty thing ridiculous - not the vampy kitten idea, which could be neat, except it just went completely haywire.
Maybe the issue would have been more successful if they invited a manga artist. *shrugs*
For now I'm very busy finishing the next chapter of my WIP...
You're talking about My Immortal? *salivates*
no subject
That's often the way...
Maybe the issue would have been more successful if they invited a manga artist. *shrugs*
I guess I just expected something... cleverer. And less squicky. Meh.
You're talking about My Immortal? *salivates*
I am. Miiiight be finished by the end of this week. *crosses fingers*
no subject
I stopped expecting cleverer long ago. I'm afraid that's the biggest problem, people expecting too much.
But the squick factor... yeah, incredibly high.
Miiiight be finished by the end of this week. *crosses fingers*
*bites nails*
no subject
But if I lower my expectations any more I have to start digging. *goes to re-watch the trailer for S3 of Torchwood for the millionth time* ETA: With TW in know exactly what to expect! And I love it. :)
*bites nails*
::grins:: (Dear Lord I hope it'll live up to your expectations, I'm very nervous about this chapter.)
no subject
*gigglesnort*
With TW in know exactly what to expect! And I love it. :)
I suppose I'm a masochist - Jossverse draws me because it's practically impossible to guess Joss' next move.
Dear Lord I hope it'll live up to your expectations, I'm very nervous about this chapter.
You shouldn't be. Your story is terrific. *loves*
no subject
Oh I didn't mean it like that - I was thinking more about style... I mean, TW is generally over the top, over-sexed, angsty, big on plot holes and meta, and able to be utterly gut-wrenching. But it is also pretty impossible to work out where it'll go next! (As for Joss, then I'm *worried* what his next move is going to be.)
Anyway, I must run. And thank you lots for the encouragement! *hugs*
no subject
Yes, current BtVS style is baffling. :))))
*smoochies*
no subject
*smoochies back*
no subject