moscow_watcher: (Scoobies)
moscow_watcher ([personal profile] moscow_watcher) wrote2009-04-07 09:18 pm
Entry tags:

Buffy #24 (kinda) review



I haven't written anything about issue #23 because, frankly, I felt I had nothing to say. The issue was ridiculous setting-wise and plot-wise, it had funny Andrew bits and it inequivocally demonstrated that Joss plans to tease shippers ad infinitum.

I was looking forward to issue 24 with certain trepidation, because recently I grew fond of Faith and I appreciate Richards' art more than Jeanty's. So, at least, I hoped to get a couple of decent Faith panels.

I got them. Richards' Faith is luscious, edgy, sexy and determined. Another plus is that she looks like Faith would look now. Like Eliza Dushku looks in Dollhouse. My favorite panel is the one on the train, where Faith says that the new slayers have the right to choose whether to fight or to live peacefully.

But the the plotting - or, rather, the concept - is more than clumsy. It goes against everything we know about vampires.

So, Faith and Giles meet a slayer who ran away from her squad. She tells them about a slayer sanctuary in Hanselstadt. Giles decides to find the place. They board a train at platform 9-3/4 and arrive in a bucolic town where only old folks live. Turns out there is a demon in residence who feeds on fears and regrets. He eats children and slayers (yes, the "sanctuary" is a trap!) and, as a side-effect, protects the town from vampires.

Because, as an evil ex-Watcher declares, "the vampire is regret personified. A hunger for life that's been damned to never be satisfied." That's why vampires eschew Hanselstadt.

Huh?

Looks like the further into season 8 we go, the more we stray from the tired premise of vampires as pure evil. Now, vampires personify regrets. I'm curious if this new development was a one-issue plot necessity or a new trend.

The issue is more Giles-centric than Faith-centric. [livejournal.com profile] shadowkat67 wrote an in-depth analysis of Giles' character development in this issue so I won't go there. Faith doesn't have much to do here. Of course, she fights the demon and with Giles' help she kills it but she doesn't face any of those controversial moral dilemmas that make Buffyverse so fascinating.

I wonder if the demon is supposed to work as a social commentary on the demographic situation in Europe where many places have negative natality rate, or, as [livejournal.com profile] shadowcat67 thinks, a metaphor of regrets sucking the passion out of our souls. Or both.

Anyway. What bothers me is how uninspiring - to me - this story looks. Issue #24 is a typical MOTW one-shot. It features the characters I love - yet nothing of it lingers in my mind except a couple of beautiful Faith panels. I think I had the same problem with the previous issue - it was OK but there was nothing compelling in it.

I have the impression that this is the biggest problem with season 8. It's doomed to be either sensational or boring. There is no middle ground. To be compelling it has to be controversial. The comics don't grab me unless Buffy turns out to be a lesbian, or an enemy of humanity, or a bank robber. Or she (arguably) destroys the Fray timeline. Or?...

Writers have to up the ante with every issue to make the story compelling. How long could they do it until it fizzles out ot goes out of hand completely?
ext_15284: a wreath of lightning against a dark, stormy sky (Default)

[identity profile] stormwreath.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
This issue seems to have polarised opinion, with some people loving it and others being really, really hostile. I enjoyed it on its own merits as a classic Gothic horror story, but I don't think it had much to do with the Buffyverse or Season 8.


I wonder if the demon is supposed to work as a social commentary on the demographic situation in Europe where many places have negative natality rate

The other analogy that came to mind is the way the older generation send their children away to fight and die in wars in the name of protecting (their own) way of life. It can be seen as a metaphor for the Slayers pre-empowerment spell. The folk of Hanselstadt convinced themselves that they were doing the right thing, making sacrifices for the common good. You could also draw the analogy with what their parents did in the Germany of the 1930s, with the Watcher Fillworthe in the role of a certain other well-known leader of that period. (If, that is, you assume that the plan to deliberately feed children to the demon to protect the adults of the town was his idea, and they went along with it.)
shapinglight: (Default)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2009-04-07 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I have the impression that this is the biggest problem with season 8. It's doomed to be either sensational or boring. There is no middle ground. To be compelling it has to be controversial. The comics don't grab me unless Buffy turns out to be a lesbian, or an enemy of humanity, or a bank robber. Or she (arguably) destroys the Fray timeline. Or?...

Good point, Moscow. And I agree. This issue was very lacklustre and you could have substituted Faith and Giles for any character because there was nothing to distinguish them as Faith and Giles IMO.

Such a disappointment.

[identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Well I think that in the course of BtVS vampires have represented a lot of stuff besides pure evil.
Recently I read 'Twilight' (which I'll admit I disliked intensely) and I argued w/a friend that wanting to become a vampire was tantamount to wanting to commit suicide, because no vampire can grow or create or ever hope to be more than what they are. My friend disagreed 100% to her wanting to become a vampire was wanting to embrace sexual desire even if it is 'forbidden' or not what is accepted as normal. I think both of us got our attitudes from Buffy, and that both have merit.

This issue is focusing on one particular idea, and I'm assuming it will be referenced and gain in importance when Joss finally gets to the point. I think that Brian Lynch's comics were more exciting, and more tightly written, because he had a serious deadline for his arc and he couldn't waste time spinning out his tale for years and years. Joss is under no such constraint; I'm confident that he will tie everything together eventually (as he did w/Astonishing X-men) but heaven knows how long he'll take to get there!

[identity profile] menomegirl.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd been looking forward to reading #24, since I'd liked the last Faith/Giles arc, but....*shrugs*

To quote Evil!Willow...

Bored Now.

[identity profile] mulder200.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, at least I won't have to waste my money on buying it them.

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm afraid I'm right there with you in being disappointed. It wasn't a very good issue. Flat characterization, poorly executed premise and serious plot holes.

[livejournal.com profile] stormwreath said above that people were being hostile to this one and I imagine it might be directed at me as I've been the most vocal about the issue in the forums recently. I think everyone needs to draw a line between being disappointed with the issue though (which is what I am) and then discussing it on a forum and the debate/hostility that comes from that environment. The issue itself disappointed me to the point that I have no urge to read it again and I didn't enjoy it sadly. The only reason I've gone back to read it is for forum discussions, picking it apart analytically.

I'll be happy to move on the next issue and I'm hoping that Espenson has a better handle on the medium for the upcoming Retreat arc. This issue was a bucketful of meh to me.
elisi: Edwin and Charles (Default)

[personal profile] elisi 2009-04-07 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I am increasingly happy and relieved that I've stopped reading! :)

[identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Now, vampires personify regrets.

I believe the relevant phrase is "People still fall for that old Anne Rice routine?" If anything, Buffyverse vampires (generally speaking) are the antithesis of regret.

I'm curious if this new development was a one-issue plot necessity or a new trend.

I'm pretty sure it's the former. Or simply Krueger showing that he's not very familiar with canon.

How long could they do it until it fizzles out ot goes out of hand completely?

Unless it picks up soon, I'd say about 19 issues.

[identity profile] powerofthebook.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Looks like the further into season 8 we go, the more we stray from the tired premise of vampires as pure evil. Now, vampires personify regrets. I'm curious if this new development was a one-issue plot necessity or a new trend.

I tend to think Spike and Angel would have a bone to pick with being considered creatures of regret prior to gaining their souls. Granted, pre-soul Spike showed remorse, but I think it would have been a stretch to call him the personification of regret.

I have the impression that this is the biggest problem with season 8. It's doomed to be either sensational or boring. There is no middle ground. To be compelling it has to be controversial.

Agree 100 percent. On the television series, even when an episode was kind of a stand-alone, it usually progressed the season's arc somewhat, or added a bit of depth to the characters. Like S5's "Triangle." It's a standard "Willow's magic goes awry" plotline, but we get the two main women in Xander's life coming to an agreement over boundaries, Buffy dealing with the Riley break-up, Spike trying to court Buffy, Giles coming back with news from the Watcher's Council...

Also, why did the vampires just hang out around the edges of the town? If I have to accept that the monster in town drives back the vampires because they're so regretful, why do I have to accept that dozens of vampires have nothing better to do but hang out and live on squirrels and rabbits, waiting for the monster to leave or die?

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Although I'm still very optimistic about the season as a whole, I really didn't like this issue.

I agree with you that the notion that vampires are regret personified is incoherent. [profile] shadowkat67 wants to say that regret isn't remorse, but rather unfulfilled desire (or something like that). But I don't see how you can fit that with the fact that the demon apparently could chow down on Faith and Giles precisely because they do have regrets.

But it's not worth thinking about. I just don't believe Krueger has a handle on the verse, so I'm not going to spend time trying to look for deeper meanings here.

And not following up on Faith and Giles in any kind of interesting way? Criminal.

I like your idea about the metaphor on falling birthrates. But I rather doubt that Krueger was thinking about that. It's a very low visibility issue here in the states, and to the extent that people care about it, they are conservatives in the so-called culture wars.

Here's hoping that #24 is just an outlier.

[identity profile] tinka023.livejournal.com 2009-04-07 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
i think that season 8 buffy comics are destorying the original Buffyverse and the characters within are going completely out of character.

Everyone seems to turn out to be evil in some way and the characters are either fighting, hiding or they seem to be constantly betraying each other!

these comics are really depressing and are slowly destroying Buffy/Angel for me :(

[identity profile] majingojira.livejournal.com 2009-04-08 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't picked up the issue yet (I'm a trades guy) so take this comment as you will:

Because, as an evil ex-Watcher declares, "the vampire is regret personified. A hunger for life that's been damned to never be satisfied." That's why vampires eschew Hanselstadt.

It's entirely possible that the evil ex-watcher was full of it. Just because a character says something doesn't mean it's acurate--even if they're super-knowledgeable types.

[identity profile] filmtx.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 01:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't read your review because I haven't read the issue yet. But I just wanted to wish you a Happy Birthday!

OT - H.B.

[identity profile] beloved4always.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
A VERY Happy Birthday to you MW. Hope you have a WONDERFUL day!!!

[identity profile] sentine.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I wish you a wonderful birthday :)
herself_nyc: (Default)

[personal profile] herself_nyc 2009-04-16 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Happy birthday!!!