but the way in which she does so (bank robbery) is criminal, amoral and unresponsible (especially so since she implicates her charges).
It's basically all an act of desperation, Buffy was desperate for money to provide the facilities and clothes and feed the girls and rent/buy the castle. It's obvious they have no other mean for money. They couldn't have a garage sale or a lemonade stand *g* They needed money. Buffy got them the money. Was what she did wrong? Yes. Do we understand why she did it? Yes. Is she living up to the responsibility of why she did it and the consequences of what she's done? We're seeing that.
Everybody looks up to Buffy (even Giles). That's hard. We've seen that in S7. And this time we have a logical reason of how Buffy can support all these girls, unless they used the money Anya robbed from the bank in Him.
Buffy is not a bad person, she's not a perfect one, that's why she's interesting. Who wants another Clark Kent?
no subject
It's basically all an act of desperation, Buffy was desperate for money to provide the facilities and clothes and feed the girls and rent/buy the castle. It's obvious they have no other mean for money. They couldn't have a garage sale or a lemonade stand *g* They needed money. Buffy got them the money. Was what she did wrong? Yes. Do we understand why she did it? Yes. Is she living up to the responsibility of why she did it and the consequences of what she's done? We're seeing that.
Everybody looks up to Buffy (even Giles). That's hard. We've seen that in S7. And this time we have a logical reason of how Buffy can support all these girls, unless they used the money Anya robbed from the bank in Him.
Buffy is not a bad person, she's not a perfect one, that's why she's interesting. Who wants another Clark Kent?